We Are Nantucket Homeowners, Not A Hotel

To the editor: As Nantucket homeowners for 26 years, who spend between 100 and 120 days a year on island and who rent our property to visitors, we are concerned by recent letters using the word “commercialization” to describe Nantucket Vacation Rentals in our residential neighborhoods that have existed for over 100 years. That kind of language misrepresents what’s happening and unfairly maligns responsible property owners like us.

When we rent our home, it’s not to throw parties, host weddings or run a business. If we were a commercial business, considering all the money we have put in over the years to cover the mortgage and expenses that exceed rent received, I would have fired myself long ago and be out of business.

Our guests are families who want to experience Nantucket respectfully. They cook, sleep, enjoy the island, and leave our home as they found it. They’re using the home for exactly what it’s meant for — living — just for a short stay.

There’s also been a lot of talk about STRs putting added stress on the island’s environment and infrastructure. But a family staying in our home uses no more water, energy, or waste disposal than if our family were there ourselves. In fact, many STR owners are actively engaged in conservation efforts and educate guests on Nantucket’s fragile ecosystem, waste limits, and water use.

Yes, rent is exchanged. But the same is true for long-term leases, which no one labels “commercial.” Courts have found repeatedly that short-term stays don’t automatically make a use commercial, especially when zoning laws don’t define them that way.

We care deeply about Nantucket’s character and sustainability, and we support thoughtful policies that protect both. But we won’t end the divisiveness using loaded words like “commercialization” to scare people.

Let’s focus on facts, fairness, and what works for all residents — seasonal, year-round, and visiting.

Bob and Virgini Vidoni